A large number of resources ranging from websites, journal articles to self-help books discussing sexual compulsivity exist. Simply complete a web search, and the number of hits is about 2 million. My goal here is not to replicate what is already available. In this venue, I’ve chosen to summarize and simplify the definition. Remember, my goal is not a theoretical treatise, or academic journal article. My goal is to identify a definition that works in the majority of circumstances to provide a resource for individuals struggling with sexual compulsivity.
The definition of sexual compulsivity that I use has two parts. The first part is a subjective level. On some level, the individual recognizes that his/her sexual behavior interferes with his/her life. The second level is an objective level. The interfering sexual behaviors sometimes will breach an external boundary with consequences.
Each part requires additional exploration. On the first part, the individual recognizes that their sexual behavior is a problem. Sexual compulsivity is when as any sexual behavior or thought violates your personal values and boundaries. These behaviors often lead to negative feelings of guilt, shame, and self-recrimination. In psychology we call this egodystonic. In my treatment approach, there is a failure of integrity between what they say they want and what they do. The vast majority of people seeking help realize they need help. Because of the recognition by the individual that he or she has a problem, it is usually sufficient to focus on the first part of the definition in my work.
The second part of the definition allows external feedback to the person regarding the impact of their sexual behavior on others. In some cases this can be a legal consequence such as an arrest. In other cases, the behaviors create financial consequences. And yet in some other cases, relationships end because of the violation of the boundaries. This objective part of the definition may not always be present, but is useful when the level of denial regarding the individual’s internal awareness is so great that they fail to recognize the impact of the behavior.
Two of the dilemmas with this definition are what some critics of the field say is sex negativity, and labeling of many types of sexual expression as sexual compulsivity as a form of social control. A classic example is how homosexuality was previously illegal or an illness; now control is exerted by labeling homosexuality a sin. I am aware of these concerns. In later posts, I will write about sexual positive and sexual health.
Just to note, sexual compulsivity is not the same as sexual promiscuity or pedophilia. Sexual compulsivity also can occur in the absence of sexual behavior (obsessive thoughts, fear of sex). Sexual compulsivity is also not the same as pedophilia (defined as an attraction to children). And while they may sometimes (rarely!) overlap, the two issues are separate therapeutic concerns.
In the end, the goal of this post was to help people recognize the concept of sexual compulsivity. The key component is the individual’s recognition that their sexual behavior creates a problem in their life. The key to treatment, however, requires additional information as to why, what, who, when, and where the problem lies.
No comments:
Post a Comment